In this article, it is recommended that following the model offered by the Romanian legislature, at par.(1) art.165 PC RM, at Chapter XIII of the General Part of the Penal Code of Republic of Moldova, to implement a norm which would contain the definition of the term “person exploitation”. It is argued that it’s rather appropriate the addition of the domestic penal law with a norm that would have implied the act of using the services of an exploited person, after the model of art.216 of the Penal Code of Romania from 17.07.2009. It is pointed out that, after the model offered by the Bulgarian legislature, the German and the Ukrainian one, the circumstance of committing the offense with legal passing of the state border is to be recommended as an aggravating circumstance of the offense provided by art.165 PC RM. It is concluded that the goal of sexual exploitation is not the purpose of persons trafficking in the Penal laws of Turkey and Canada. In these situations, somehow improper, are followed the stipulations of the incriminating provisions of the offence of pimping. In this regard, Republic of Moldova has more effective settlements on human beings trafficking.