Urmările prejudiciabile în cazul infracţiunii de escrocherie: analiză de drept penal
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
751 7
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2023-05-02 20:07
SM ISO690:2012
BOTEZATU, Igor. Urmările prejudiciabile în cazul infracţiunii de escrocherie: analiză de drept penal. In: Studia Universitatis Moldaviae (Seria Ştiinţe Sociale), 2010, nr. 3(33), pp. 143-147. ISSN 1814-3199.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Studia Universitatis Moldaviae (Seria Ştiinţe Sociale)
Numărul 3(33) / 2010 / ISSN 1814-3199 /ISSNe 2345-1017

Urmările prejudiciabile în cazul infracţiunii de escrocherie: analiză de drept penal

Pag. 143-147

Botezatu Igor
 
Universitatea de Stat din Moldova
 
Disponibil în IBN: 29 iulie 2013


Rezumat

The examination of the prejudicial consequences, managed in different swindling cases, shows that, correlating to the moment of the criminal activity black out the attempt of swindling may conclude the following hypothesis: a) is performed only the adjacent activity – fraud or abuse of trust, but the main action remains steady – the illicit obtaining of immobile foreign wealth; b) the adjacent activity is performed, also does the partial of the main action: dispossession does not induce putting into possession. As well, the crime of swindling object is the one to ascertain the essence and the exterior form of the crime prejudicial consequences itself. The pursuit of the delimitation of the offence of swindling and the offence prevented at art.196 PC RM, we must specify the following: only the effective patrimonial prejudice is in order to characterize the offence of swindling prejudicial consequences; withstanding of, in art.196 PC RM offence case, the prejudicial consequences express themselves toward the effective patrimonial prejudice and throughout the lost income as well. Likewise, is important to mention about, that in time of the offence of swindling qualification the patrimonial prejudice is the prejudice to make reference to. The moral prejudice can’t be referred to the prejudicial consequences generated by the offence prevented at art.190 PC RM.