Contribuţie la susţinerea teoriei privind provenienţa hibridogenă a prunului comun (Prunus domestica L.)
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
820 6
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-01-17 13:29
SM ISO690:2012
RUDENCO, Ion, COMANICI, Ion. Contribuţie la susţinerea teoriei privind provenienţa hibridogenă a prunului comun (Prunus domestica L.). In: Revista Botanică, 2011, nr. 1(3), pp. 74-79. ISSN 1857-2367.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Revista Botanică
Numărul 1(3) / 2011 / ISSN 1857-2367 /ISSNe 2587-3814

Contribuţie la susţinerea teoriei privind provenienţa hibridogenă a prunului comun (Prunus domestica L.)

Pag. 74-79

Rudenco Ion, Comanici Ion
 
Gradina Botanică (Institut) a AŞM
 
Disponibil în IBN: 22 noiembrie 2013


Rezumat

The hypothesis on the falseness origin’ Prunus domestica L. propound by M. Crane and W. Lawrence was confi rmed by Rîbin [5] doing multiple crossbreeding between Prunus spinosa L. and P. cerasifera Ehrh. This theory was questioned (was called in question) by the French geneticist G. Sallesses according to exists an absence in hybrid generations the forms with yellow fruits. The version forwarded by Sallesses gets sustentation in some publications [1]. In the present article is done the detailed description of the hybrid forms of different ploidy obtained as a result of the Prunus spinosa L. and P. cerasifera Ehrh. hybridization which bearing yellow fruits: (1) the allotriploid form (2n=3x=24) obtained from the crossbreeding of Prunus spinosa x P. cerasifera; (2) the allotriploid hybrid (sesquidiploid 2n=4x=32) from (by) self-pollination of allotetraploid hybrid between Prunus spinosa L. and P. cerasifera Ehrh. “Kostomarov”; (3) the trigenome hexaploids (2n=6x=48) obtained on the base of crossbreeding of Prunus spinosa L. synthetically re-synthesized with the culture varieties (Prunus spinosa x P. cerasifera) x Prunus domestica. These hybrids try to refute the version of G. Sallesses.