Президентские (2005) выборы в Молдове: специфика, стратегии, результаты
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
831 1
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2016-03-17 22:12
SM ISO690:2012
МОШНЯГА, Валериу, ЗАВТУР, Клаудия, РУСНАК, Георгий, ЦУРКАНУ, Валентин. Президентские (2005) выборы в Молдове: специфика, стратегии, результаты . In: Moldoscopie, 2006, nr. 1(32), pp. 73-91. ISSN 1812-2566.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Moldoscopie
Numărul 1(32) / 2006 / ISSN 1812-2566 /ISSNe 2587-4063

Президентские (2005) выборы в Молдове: специфика, стратегии, результаты

Pag. 73-91

Мошняга Валериу1, Завтур Клаудия2, Руснак Георгий1, Цуркану Валентин
 
1 Молдавский Государственный Университет,
2 Institutul de Studii Politice şi Relaţii Internaţionale
 
Disponibil în IBN: 29 iulie 2013


Rezumat

This article speaks about the specificity, strategy and results of the Presidential elections (2005) in the Republic of Moldova. The specificity of presidential election (2005) consists in the fact that they were the second election on the history of the country when the president was elected not by the people of the country, but by the Parliament. For the first time, the President has applied for the second term. Elections were greatly influenced by the Parliamentary Elections (2005) held one month and a half before. This proved in an active interaction of international actors, attempts to use the electoral revolutionary scenarios to win. The article analyses electoral strategies of the Governing party, of the “constructive” and “destructive” opposition used juts before the presidential elections; the main reasons of the accomplishment / non-accomplishment of actions of each Moldovan political actor of involved in the Presidential Elections are discussed as well. Governing party had a correct and differentiated strategy in elections, it supported the candidate well known and highly rated in the country, the President V.Voronin. The party had an active collaboration with international actors who helped in building a constructive dialogue, overcoming personal discontent between the governing party and the “constructive” opposition. The “constructive” opposition (CDPM, SLP, DPM) proved a consequential attitude the protection of Moldovan political opposition’s interests, combining the interests of the country with the ones of their parties; they coordinated their voting with conditions to be fulfilled by the governing party. The fulfillment of these conditions shall enhance the consolidation of democratic rules and traditions in Moldova. The strategy of “obstructive” opposition was not consequent, contradictory, greatly conditioned by the lack of political experience of leader S.Urechean. The “obstructive” opposition trended to combine in its political maneuvers the tactics of “conditions” and outside Parliament methods of fight by non-allowing the election of V.Voronin for the second Presidential term. However, unlike the Governing party and the “constructive” opposition, the “destructive” opposition failed to achieve envisaged results. The Presidential elections proved the growth of the Moldovan political elite, it proves ability towards political dialogue and consensus. Although, so far with the support of international political actors.