Din culisele diplomatice a semnării tratatului de pace de la București: rolul lui Manuc Bey
Închide
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
276 12
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-02-29 13:34
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
94(498) (448)
Istoria României. Republica România (133)
SM ISO690:2012
MISCHEVCA, Vladimir. Din culisele diplomatice a semnării tratatului de pace de la București: rolul lui Manuc Bey. In: Latinitate, Romanitate, Românitate, Ed. 5, 5-6 noiembrie 2021, Chișinău. Chișinău: Centrul Editorial-Poligrafic al USM, 2022, Ediția 5, pp. 244-265. ISBN 978-9975-159-60-9.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Latinitate, Romanitate, Românitate
Ediția 5, 2022
Conferința "Latinitate, Romanitate, Românitate"
5, Chișinău, Moldova, 5-6 noiembrie 2021

Din culisele diplomatice a semnării tratatului de pace de la București: rolul lui Manuc Bey

From the diplomatic backstage of signing the peace treaty in Bucharest: the role of Manuc Bey

CZU: 94(498)

Pag. 244-265

Mischevca Vladimir
 
Institutul de Istorie
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 28 septembrie 2022


Rezumat

One of the less researched actors of the events related to the RussoTurkish War of 1806-1812, involved in the politico-diplomatic actions, who trafficked influence on the Russian-Ottoman negotiations was the influential and rich Armenian Manuc (Emanuel), known at the time as Manuc Bey (1769–1817). Originally known as a merchant of Armenian descent south of the Danube, he ended his career as a knight of the Order of St. Vladimir (3rd degree), Russian state counselor (equivalent to the rank of general), informant of Russian diplomacy, banker and landowner rich, with ambitious economic plans in Bessarabia. 36 He actively played his role as an intermediary in the secret peace negotiations between Russian and Ottoman diplomacy, being a useful agent for Russia in promoting influence peddling. During the Russo-Turkish War and until 1817, the year of his death, Manuc Bey carried out a multilateral, secret and complex activity of diplomacy, commercial affairs and politics, which made it difficult to identify his loyalties and ambitions.