Efficacy and safety of an interleukin 6 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: A phase II dose-ranging randomised controlled trial
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
244 0
SM ISO690:2012
WALLACE, Daniel J., STRAND, Vibeke, MERRILL, Joan T., POPA, Serghei, SPINDLER, Alberto J., EIMON, Aliciaf, NOI, Autori. Efficacy and safety of an interleukin 6 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: A phase II dose-ranging randomised controlled trial. In: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2017, vol. 76, pp. 534-542. ISSN -. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209668
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Volumul 76 / 2017 / ISSN - /ISSNe 0003-4967

Efficacy and safety of an interleukin 6 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: A phase II dose-ranging randomised controlled trial

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209668

Pag. 534-542

Wallace Daniel J.1, Strand Vibeke2, Merrill Joan T.3, Popa Serghei4, Spindler Alberto J.5, Eimon Aliciaf6, Noi Autori
 
1 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles,
2 Stanford University, Palo Alto,
3 Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City,
4 Timofei Moșneaga Republican Clinical Hospital,
5 Private Medical Center of Rheumatology, Tucuman,
6 CEMIC, Buenos Aires
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 10 iunie 2022


Rezumat

 Objectives This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of an interleukin (IL) 6 monoclonal antibody for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods Patients with active disease were randomised to placebo or PF-04236921 10 mg, 50 mg or 200 mg, subcutaneously, every 8 weeks with stable background therapy. SLE Responder Index (SRI-4; primary end point) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) were assessed at week 24. Post hoc analysis identified an enriched population based upon planned univariate analyses. Results 183 patients received treatment (placebo, n=45; 10 mg, n=45; 50 mg, n=47; 200 mg, n=46). The 200 mg dose was discontinued due to safety findings and not included in the primary efficacy analysis. The SRI-4 response rates were not significant for any dose compared with placebo; however, the BICLA response rate was significant for 10 mg (p=0.026). The incidence of severe flares was significantly reduced with 10 mg (n=0) and 50 mg (n=2) combined versus placebo (n=8; p<0.01). In patients with greater baseline disease activity (enriched population), the SRI-4 (p=0.004) and BICLA (p=0.012) response rates were significantly different with 10 mg versus placebo. Four deaths (200 mg, n=3; 10 mg, n=1) occurred. The most frequently reported adverse events included headache, nausea and diarrhoea. Conclusions PF-04236921 was not significantly different from placebo for the primary efficacy end point in patients with SLE. Evidence of an effect with 10 mg was seen in a post hoc analysis. Safety was acceptable for doses up to 50 mg as the 200 mg dose was discontinued due to safety findings. 

Cuvinte-cheie
autoimmune diseases, cytokines, systemic lupus erythematosus, treatment