Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
259 1 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2022-10-14 09:34 |
SM ISO690:2012 CRAVCENCO, Denis, POSTOLACHI, Alexandru. Linear and volumetric analysis of condylar morphology in adults: a cone-beam computed tomography study. In: Cercetarea în biomedicină și sănătate: calitate, excelență și performanță, Ed. 1, 20-22 octombrie 2021, Chişinău. Chișinău, Republica Moldova: 2021, p. 481. ISBN 978-9975-82-223-7 (PDF).. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Cercetarea în biomedicină și sănătate: calitate, excelență și performanță 2021 | ||||||
Conferința "Cercetarea în biomedicină și sănătate: calitate, excelență și performanță" 1, Chişinău, Moldova, 20-22 octombrie 2021 | ||||||
|
||||||
Pag. 481-481 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
Background. Determination of linear and volumetric parameters of the mandibular condyle (CM) in normal and pathological conditions is one of the relevant issues of modern dentistry, considering the importance of the condyle in TMJ and the entire dentoalveolar system functioning. Objective of the study. The purpose of the study was to analyze the available literature and to determine linear and volumetric parameters of the CM in adults using computed tomography (CT). Material and Methods. The analysis of the literature was performed, in number of 14 scientific papers (2007 – 2021). In present study, the volumetric and linear parameters of 82 CM were studied using CBCT in 41 people aged 25-58 years without TMJ pathologies and signs of CM atrophy. Measurements and statistical processing were performed using Slicer 3D and Microsoft Excel software. Results. The mean CM volume in the study group - 1759 ± 88.7 mm3, the CM height - 18.65 ± 0.54 mm, and the CM width - 19.79 ± 0.45 mm (95% confidence interval), which corresponds to the data of Mendoza et al, 2018; Santander et al, 2020. The difference in volume between the right and left condyle for the same pacients averaged 7.78 ± 1.95%, ranging from 0 to 25%. Conclusion. The results partially confirm the literature data. Discrepancies are explained by the use of different measurement methods, as well as the incongruity of the study groups. The comparison of the right and left CM volume was not found in the literature, being an original information. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie mandibular condyle, morphology, computed tomography, condil mandibular, morfologie, tomografie computerizată |
||||||
|