Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
301 1 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2021-08-28 15:55 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
94(478)”1856-1857” (2) |
Istoria Moldovei. Republica Moldova (67) |
SM ISO690:2012 SCLIFOS, Eugen-Tudor. Problema Basarabiei în corespondenţa dintre contele Walewski şi Charles Auguste de Morny. documente inedite 1856-1857. In: Anuarul Institutului de Istorie , 2016, nr. 5, pp. 177-188. ISSN 2345-1939. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Anuarul Institutului de Istorie | ||||||
Numărul 5 / 2016 / ISSN 2345-1939 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 94(478)”1856-1857” | ||||||
Pag. 177-188 | ||||||
|
||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
The Bessarabian question has occupied an important place in the foreign policy of Great Powers, after the Crimean War in 1856. In the january of 1856, Russia accepts peace preliminaries, including the return of southern Bessara-bia to Moldova. At the Congress of Paris, between february and march 1856, the russian plenipotentiaries were supported by Walewski, in their effort to keep Bessarabia in the Russia Empire. Its important to say that count Walewski initially sustained that southern Bessarabia must be returned to Moldova, but later his position was radically changed. After the congress of Paris, who could not solve the problem new frontier in Bessarabia, Walewski was a real sup-porter of Russia in this delicate question. In the diplomatic documents from the Archives of Foreign Policy in Paris, especially in the correspondence between Walewski and french ambassador in Petersburg, Charles Auguste de Morny, which highlights that the two french diplomats supports the idea that southern Bessarabia must remain to Russia, because the town named Bolgrad, is an im-portant administrative center for bulgarian colonies. The documents show the involvement of those two diplomatic in the bessarabian question, but in the russian support. Bessarabia again becomes an important piece in the diplomat-ic game of Great Powers, for, who had antagonistic interests |
||||||
|