The world’s enlightened minds have had longtime access to backstage of creativity, with or without creativity, because until being creative the observer had watched with the accuracy of critical thought this density of originality in symphony with reality – called creativity – a source of peace, between a dreamer and a pragmatic.We haven’t opted for an exclusivist position by having ensured ourselves a supplementary vision on a certain side of creativity (some of them truly tempting); instead, we have chosen a novel approach, free from intellectual error, focused on the rotation axis, more precisely the gyroscope. The perspective we have chosen as an invitation to reflection is a mobile one, whose dynamic is controlled by impulse and which looks like a toy in relation to the deep subject of creativity, which is by no means some kids’ play. An active ferment of the content-creating cognitive psychic process, creativity stands at the basis of novelty, the New which requires constant adaptation. No human being in the animal reign has proved so concerned about modeling the reality or the environment as humans have. Why does the artist seem flooded by creative effervescence only by watching the breeze through the trees, while the scientist, “tormented” by the rigor of argumentation, is often deprived of it? In a perfect world, is the act of creation even possible? Can we create something that does not exist? Is mankind betting on creativity in the attempt to “reconcile” with the future? We have many questions to launch, being aware that a carefully crafted question leads to a significance-loaded answer.