Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
413 12 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2023-12-16 16:55 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
008:72.036(478+498)"XX" (1) |
Civilizație. Cultură. Progres (814) |
Arhitectură (635) |
SM ISO690:2012 RUSU, Dumitru. An Analysis of Socialist Modernist Heritage in Romania and the Republic of Moldova through Case Studies: Utilitarian Buildings and Industrial Facilities. In: Plural. History, Culture, Society, 2020, nr. 2, pp. 131-141. ISSN 2345-1262. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Plural. History, Culture, Society | |||||
Numărul 2 / 2020 / ISSN 2345-1262 /ISSNe 2345-184X | |||||
|
|||||
CZU: 008:72.036(478+498)"XX" | |||||
Pag. 131-141 | |||||
|
|||||
Descarcă PDF | |||||
Rezumat | |||||
The “Socialist Modernism” Project is part of an initiative by B.A.C.U. Association focused on protecting built heritage in the former socialist bloc. In that respect, we have launched a campaign for the preservation of buildings that are specific to the socialist modernist period (1955–1991). The architecture of the socialist period, more precisely the modernist tendencies in 1955–1991, is a specific trend in the evolution of architecture in the former socialist bloc. There is increasing international awareness for this trend, as indicated by the creation of scientific communities (the SocHeritage Platform, part of the ICOMOS International Scientific Committee for the 20th century). The chosen period in our study was set by historic events that led to this new architectural tendency. At the time, the approach was inspired by modernist architecture, which came to the capitalist states in Western Europe with a set of principles. In socialist countries, modernist trends first influenced the professional sphere, and through that influence, they were able to penetrate borders and the limits imposed by ideology. The current orientations regarding built heritage in Romania and the Republic of Moldova are the preservation of local cultural identity and the coherent management of the existing built patrimony. The listed heritage of Romania and the Republic of Moldova includes a variety of objectives, from prehistoric settlements to 20th-century buildings, but those from the socialist period are systematically ignored. One of the actions initiated as part of our program was to launch procedures in order for buildings from representative industrial ensembles in Romania and the Republic of Moldova to be classified as Historical Monuments. They are the ones presented in these case studies, among others: Buzau – the Sugar Factory (1965); Bucharest – the Worsted Mill (1965); and Chișinău – the Fashion House (the ‘70s). Although the age of the buildings is an important criterion in establishing historic value today, the architectural features of these buildings, their planimetric and structural coherence are enough to qualify them as highly valuable. Also, they point out the socialist constructive doctrine, being representative for the way that the light and the heavy industry buildings of the time were built and standardized. |
|||||
Cuvinte-cheie Socialist Architecture, Urban Heritage, architectural heritage, Utilitarian Buildings, Industrial Buildings, arhitectură socialistă, patrimoniu urban, patrimoniu arhitectural, clădiri utilitare, clădiri industriale |
|||||
|