Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
539 11 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2023-11-17 03:38 |
Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
618.4:615.851.14 (1) |
Științe medicale. Medicină (11136) |
Fizioterapie. Terapie fizică. Radioterapie. Alte tratamente terapeutice non-medicamentoase (288) |
SM ISO690:2012 DONDIUC, Iurie, MARIAN, Andriana, CALIGA, Gheorghe. Pregătirea psihoprofilactică antenatală – impact şi beneficii. In: Buletin de Perinatologie, 2020, nr. 1(86), pp. 81-85. ISSN 1810-5289. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Buletin de Perinatologie | ||||||
Numărul 1(86) / 2020 / ISSN 1810-5289 | ||||||
|
||||||
CZU: 618.4:615.851.14 | ||||||
Pag. 81-85 | ||||||
|
||||||
Descarcă PDF | ||||||
Rezumat | ||||||
Introduction: A pressing issue in modern obstetrics is women’s preparedness for childbirth, both from a medical and psycho-emotional perspective. Th e psycho-emotional state and birth readiness of a pregnant woman, on a great extent determines the future course of labor. Multiple psychological and emotional factors cause potential complications during childbirth and damage the obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Aim: Assessing the development and eff ectiveness of psychoprophylactic preparation of pregnant women, and estimating the impact of antenatal training on childbirth. Materials and Methods: Th e study is based on a survey of 299 participants. Th e inquiries involved questions on overall health condition, observations during pregnancy, experience during delivery and psychological training. Th e data was processed through statistical analysis. Results: Th e inquiry indicates that 104 participants (34,8%) found out about the existence of psychoprophylactic training only aft er the childbirth as a result of our inquiries. Further, 195 women (63,5%) were informed about prenatal training by diverse sources, but only 71 (23,7%) pregnant women participated in psycho-prophylactic trainings and 228 (76,3%) did not follow any kind of prenatal education. Th e largest share of guidance was provided by the obstetriciangynecologist (79%), followed by the psychologist (60%) and the family doctor that was involved up to 21% of the time. Obtained results also point out that birth analgesia was applied to 90 respondents (30%), of which 68.8% did not attend psychoprophylactic training courses. Among the pregnant women that followed the training program, 75% of cases did not involve obstetric trauma during delivery process. In contrast, 2/3 of the participants who did not follow the educational program encountered some kind of leisons of reproductive tissues. Conclusions: Obtained results confi rm the benefi ts of antenatal psychoprophylactic training. Th is type of training helps minimize and exclude negative psychoemotional factors and is therefore an eff ective way of preventing birth complications and improving birth experience. |
||||||
Cuvinte-cheie antenatal psychoprophylactic preparation, Birth, birth complications, психопрофилактическая подготовка к родам, роды, осложнения родов |
||||||
|