Apportionment “Population paradox” and the Paradox of population influence
Închide
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
988 10
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2023-04-12 13:42
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
004+519.6 (3)
Știința și tehnologia calculatoarelor. Calculatoare. Procesarea datelor (4175)
Matematică computațională. Analiză numerică. Programarea calculatoarelor (123)
SM ISO690:2012
BOLUN, Ion. Apportionment “Population paradox” and the Paradox of population influence. In: Computer Science Journal of Moldova, 2020, nr. 1(82), pp. 21-44. ISSN 1561-4042.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Computer Science Journal of Moldova
Numărul 1(82) / 2020 / ISSN 1561-4042 /ISSNe 2587-4330

Apportionment “Population paradox” and the Paradox of population influence

CZU: 004+519.6
MSC 2010: 62P25, 91B10, 91B12, 68U20

Pag. 21-44

Bolun Ion
 
Technical University of Moldova
 
 
Disponibil în IBN: 24 aprilie 2020


Rezumat

A new approach is grounded with respect to the population paradox (PPr). Further on, the paradox of population influence (PPi) is proposed. It is proven that Hamilton method is immune to the PPi, and that d’Hondt, Sainte-Lagu¨e, Huntington-Hill and Adapted Sainte-Lagu¨e methods – are not. By computer simulation, the percentage of non-immunity of Hamilton method to PPr, and the one of d’Hondt, Sainte-Lagu¨e, Huntington-Hill and Adapted Sainte-Lagu¨e divisor methods to PPi, is estimated. For a large range of initial data, this percentage, in the case of the four investigated divisor methods, does not exceed, on average, 0.6-0.8%, that is one case per a total of 120-170 cases.

Cuvinte-cheie
apportionment method, population paradox, paradox of population influence, computer simulation, comparative analyses