<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' xmlns:oai_dc='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xsi:schemaLocation='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd'>
<dc:creator>Timofei, S.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-03-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang='en'>In the present article there is concluded that the offense provided by art.246 PC RM, is an offence involving a natural plurality of perpetrators. Also, there are presented arguments to support the idea that the special quality of the subject of the offence of limiting free competition consists in its ability to act in the name of the economic agent or public administrative authority. It is shown that the subject of the offence of unfair competition has the special quality of a competing economic agent. It is revealed that the ANPC is the competitive one to establish the dominant market position of the economic agent. In the absence of such official stipulations, we can not retain the status of subject of the offence for the one to fulfill an unlawful anticompetition agreement under the conditions stipulated at par.(1), (2) and (3) art.7 of the Law on Protection of Competition. It is argued that the perpetration of the offence of limiting free competition by a person with responsibility function (someone who manages a commercial organization, public or other non-state organization) will only qualify under art.246 PC RM. Qualification under art.327 (335) or 328 PC RM will not be required.</dc:description>
<dc:source>Revista Naţională de Drept 126 (3) 34-42</dc:source>
<dc:title>Subiectul infracţiunilor în domeniul concurenţei</dc:title>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>