| Conţinutul numărului revistei |
| Articolul precedent |
| Articolul urmator |
 |
 796 4 |
| Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2021-04-30 17:03 |
| Căutarea după subiecte similare conform CZU |
| 004.94 (63) |
| Application-oriented computer-based techniques (438) |
 SM ISO690:2012BOLUN, Ion. Characterization of some apportionment methods. In: Journal of Engineering Sciences, 2019, vol. 26, nr. 4, pp. 23-44. ISSN 2587-3474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3591578 |
| EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
| Journal of Engineering Sciences | ||||||
| Volumul 26, Numărul 4 / 2019 / ISSN 2587-3474 /ISSNe 2587-3482 | ||||||
|
||||||
| DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3591578 | ||||||
| CZU: 004.94 | ||||||
| Pag. 23-44 | ||||||
|
||||||
 Descarcă PDF |
||||||
| Rezumat | ||||||
In this work known main characteristics of 11 apportionment methods are systemized, including the Hondt, Hamilton, Sainte-Laguë and Huntington-Hill methods, and some new ones are determined by computer simulation. To such characteristics, refer the disproportionality of solutions and the percentage of Quota rule violation, of the Alabama, Population and New state paradoxes occur and of favoring of beneficiaries. For a large range of initial data, where determined the preferences order of the explored apportionment methods by each of these characteristics. No one of methods is preferable by all of the six characteristics-criteria. Of the immune to the three paradoxes, d’Hondt, Huntington-Hill, Sainte-Laguë and adapted Sainte-Laguë methods, by disproportionality of solutions the best is Sainte-Laguë method, followed by the adapted Sainte-Laguë, then by the Huntington-Hill and, finally, by the d’Hondt one. The same order for these four methods is by compliance with the Quota rule. The percentage of Sainte-Laguë method’s Quota rule violation is little influenced by the total number of seats value, but it strongly decreases (over 400 times) with the increase of the number of states – from approx. 0.045% for 4 states, up to 0.0001-0.0004% for 30 states. Based on multi-aspectual comparative analyses, it is shown that from explored methods there is reasonable to use, in specific areas, only three or four: the Hamilton, Sainte-Laguë and Adapted Sainte-Laguë methods and may be the Quota linear divisor one. |
||||||
| Cuvinte-cheie apportionment paradoxes, comparative analyses, computer simulation, disproportionality of solutions, favoring of beneficiaries, qualitative characteristics, quantitative characteristics, paradoxuri de repartizare, cercetări comparative, simulare informatică, disproporţionalitate a soluţiilor, favorizare a beneficiarilor, caracteristici calitative, caracteristici cantitative |
||||||
|
DataCite XML Export
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <resource xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3' xsi:schemaLocation='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd'> <identifier identifierType='DOI'>10.5281/zenodo.3591578</identifier> <creators> <creator> <creatorName>Bolun, I.T.</creatorName> <affiliation>Universitatea Tehnică a Moldovei, Moldova, Republica</affiliation> </creator> </creators> <titles> <title xml:lang='en'>Characterization of some apportionment methods</title> </titles> <publisher>Instrumentul Bibliometric National</publisher> <publicationYear>2019</publicationYear> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType='ISSN' relationType='IsPartOf'>2587-3474</relatedIdentifier> <subjects> <subject>apportionment paradoxes</subject> <subject>comparative analyses</subject> <subject>computer simulation</subject> <subject>disproportionality of solutions</subject> <subject>favoring of beneficiaries</subject> <subject>qualitative characteristics</subject> <subject>quantitative characteristics</subject> <subject>paradoxuri de repartizare</subject> <subject>cercetări comparative</subject> <subject>simulare informatică</subject> <subject>disproporţionalitate a soluţiilor</subject> <subject>favorizare a beneficiarilor</subject> <subject>caracteristici calitative</subject> <subject>caracteristici cantitative</subject> <subject schemeURI='http://udcdata.info/' subjectScheme='UDC'>004.94</subject> </subjects> <dates> <date dateType='Issued'>2019-12-27</date> </dates> <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral='Text'>Journal article</resourceType> <descriptions> <description xml:lang='en' descriptionType='Abstract'><p>In this work known main characteristics of 11 apportionment methods are systemized, including the Hondt, Hamilton, Sainte-Laguë and Huntington-Hill methods, and some new ones are determined by computer simulation. To such characteristics, refer the disproportionality of solutions and the percentage of Quota rule violation, of the Alabama, Population and New state paradoxes occur and of favoring of beneficiaries. For a large range of initial data, where determined the preferences order of the explored apportionment methods by each of these characteristics. No one of methods is preferable by all of the six characteristics-criteria. Of the immune to the three paradoxes, d’Hondt, Huntington-Hill, Sainte-Laguë and adapted Sainte-Laguë methods, by disproportionality of solutions the best is Sainte-Laguë method, followed by the adapted Sainte-Laguë, then by the Huntington-Hill and, finally, by the d’Hondt one. The same order for these four methods is by compliance with the Quota rule. The percentage of Sainte-Laguë method’s Quota rule violation is little influenced by the total number of seats value, but it strongly decreases (over 400 times) with the increase of the number of states – from approx. 0.045% for 4 states, up to 0.0001-0.0004% for 30 states. Based on multi-aspectual comparative analyses, it is shown that from explored methods there is reasonable to use, in specific areas, only three or four: the Hamilton, Sainte-Laguë and Adapted Sainte-Laguë methods and may be the Quota linear divisor one.</p></description> <description xml:lang='ro' descriptionType='Abstract'><p>În articol sunt sistematizate principalele caracteristici cunoscute ale 11 metode de repartizare, inclusiv d’Hondt, Hamilton, Sainte-Laguë și Huntington-Hill, și sunt determinate unele noi prin simulare informatică. La asemenea caracteristici se referă disproporţionalitatea soluţiilor și procentajul de încălcare a Regulii cotei, de manifestare a paradoxurilor Alabama, al Populaţiei și al Noului Stat și de favorizare a beneficiarilor. Pentru o gamă largă de date iniţiale, a fost determinată ordinea de preferinţă a metodelor de repartizare cercetate după fiecare dintre aceste caracteristici. Niciuna dintre metode nu este preferabilă conform tuturor acestor șase caracteristici-criterii. Dintre metodele imune la cele trei paradoxuri, d’Hondt, Huntington-Hill, Sainte-Laguë și Sainte-Laguë adaptată, cea mai joasă disproporţionalitate a soluţiilor este la metoda Sainte-Laguë, urmată de cea Sainte-Laguë adaptată, apoi de cea Huntington-Hill și, în sfârșit, de metoda Hondt. Aceeași ordine pentru aceste patru metode este faţă de respectarea Regulii cotei. Procentajul încălcării Regulii cotei de către metoda Sainte-Laguë este puţin influenţat de numărul total de mandate, dar scade puternic (de peste 400 de ori) odată cu creșterea numărului de state - de la aprox. 0,045% pentru 4 state, până la 0,0001-0,0004% pentru 30 de state. Pe baza cercetărilor comparative multe-aspectuale este arătat, că dintre metodele cercetate este rezonabil de aplicat, în funcţie de caz, doar trei sau patru și anume: metodele Hamilton, Sainte-Laguë și Sainte-Laguë adaptată și, posibil, cea a Cotei cu divizor liniar.</p></description> </descriptions> <formats> <format>application/pdf</format> </formats> </resource>
|
|
|
