Acţiunea adiacentă în cadrul faptei prejudiciabile de escrocherie(Partea I)
Close
Conţinutul numărului revistei
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
869 26
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2024-02-16 17:48
SM ISO690:2012
BOTEZATU, Igor, BRÎNZA, Serghei. Acţiunea adiacentă în cadrul faptei prejudiciabile de escrocherie(Partea I) . In: Revista Naţională de Drept, 2010, nr. 9-10(120), pp. 99-106. ISSN 1811-0770.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Revista Naţională de Drept
Numărul 9-10(120) / 2010 / ISSN 1811-0770 /ISSNe 2587-411X

Acţiunea adiacentă în cadrul faptei prejudiciabile de escrocherie(Partea I)

Pag. 99-106

Botezatu Igor, Brînza Serghei
 
Universitatea de Stat din Moldova
 
Disponibil în IBN: 16 decembrie 2013


Rezumat

In this study there is pointed out that in the swindle offence case, the victim apparently voluntary delivers it goods toward the offender, and not proper voluntary. As well, is argued about the swindle offence delimitation ways, on the one side from the robbery offence, brigandage or blackmail offence, on the other side, is recommended to take into consideration if the victim will get adulterated (in the swindle offence case) or paralyzed (in the robbery, brigandage or blackmail offence cases). If, in the situation of a manufactured official act, the offender intention includes and the usage of the respective act in order to obtain illicitly another person’s goods, art.361 PC RM is going to be applied. Art.26 and art.190 PC RM are to be applied (if the usage of the illicit acts is going to fail) or art.27 and 190 PC RM (if the illicit acts had been used, but after all the goods are not obtained).