Conţinutul numărului revistei |
Articolul precedent |
Articolul urmator |
869 26 |
Ultima descărcare din IBN: 2024-02-16 17:48 |
SM ISO690:2012 BOTEZATU, Igor, BRÎNZA, Serghei. Acţiunea adiacentă în cadrul faptei
prejudiciabile de escrocherie(Partea I)
. In: Revista Naţională de Drept, 2010, nr. 9-10(120), pp. 99-106. ISSN 1811-0770. |
EXPORT metadate: Google Scholar Crossref CERIF DataCite Dublin Core |
Revista Naţională de Drept | |||||
Numărul 9-10(120) / 2010 / ISSN 1811-0770 /ISSNe 2587-411X | |||||
|
|||||
Pag. 99-106 | |||||
|
|||||
Descarcă PDF | |||||
Rezumat | |||||
In this study there is pointed out that in the swindle offence case, the victim apparently voluntary delivers it goods toward the offender, and not proper voluntary. As well, is argued about the swindle offence delimitation ways, on the one side from the robbery offence, brigandage or blackmail offence, on the other side, is recommended to take into consideration if the victim will get adulterated (in the swindle offence case) or paralyzed (in the robbery, brigandage or blackmail offence cases). If, in the situation of a manufactured official act, the offender intention includes and the usage of the respective act in order to obtain illicitly another person’s goods, art.361 PC RM is going to be applied. Art.26 and art.190 PC RM are to be applied (if the usage of the illicit acts is going to fail) or art.27 and 190 PC RM (if the illicit acts had been used, but after all the goods are not obtained). |
|||||
|