In the framework of this article, it is argued about the delimitation situations of the offence of swindling from civic norms violation (if there are not performed any commitments): the offender attitude towards receiving the goods; the offender availability regarding commitments fulfillment. The penal liability will continue even if the offender is going to indict lack of material resources considering his commitments accomplishment – and only when the offender develops unwillingness and fraudulent intentions up against the assumed commitments reported to the victim. In the offence of swindling case, the legal person can’t be the offences subject. Instead of it, the legal person is able to perform the role of a channel in order to ease up the offence perpetration. In this order of idea, we strongly recommend one important adjustment about the sanctions prevented at art. art.2141, 252 and 255 PC RM. In this way to be sure that these articles are going to present adequately the situation that the corresponding offences are graver (including, because of it subjects special qualities) than the offence prevented at art.190 PC RM.