Aprecierea probelor de către judecătorul de instrucție în contextul realizării măsurilor speciale de investigație
Close
Articolul precedent
Articolul urmator
338 4
Ultima descărcare din IBN:
2023-05-16 17:49
Căutarea după subiecte
similare conform CZU
343.123.1 (62)
Criminal justice. Criminal investigation. Criminal proceedings (1372)
SM ISO690:2012
CARAJELEASCOV, Cristina. Aprecierea probelor de către judecătorul de instrucție în contextul realizării măsurilor speciale de investigație. In: Studii şi cercetări juridice, Ed. 1, 29 iunie 2020, Chişinău. Chișinău, Republica Moldova: Institutul de Cercetări Juridice, Politice și Sociologice, 2020, Partea 1, pp. 181-187. ISBN 978-9975-3201-2-2.
EXPORT metadate:
Google Scholar
Crossref
CERIF

DataCite
Dublin Core
Studii şi cercetări juridice
Partea 1, 2020
Sesiunea "Studii şi cercetări juridice"
1, Chişinău, Moldova, 29 iunie 2020

Aprecierea probelor de către judecătorul de instrucție în contextul realizării măsurilor speciale de investigație

Assessment of the evidence by the investigating judge in the context of special investigative measures

CZU: 343.123.1

Pag. 181-187

Carajeleascov Cristina
 
Școala doctorală Științe Juridice, Politice și Sociologice
 
Disponibil în IBN: 4 mai 2022


Rezumat

At present, a prerogative of development of the Republic of Moldova is extensive practical implementation of the principles of the rule of law, which is refl ected by its capacity to ensure respect for human rights measured at the standards of the European Community. The criminal procedure implies performance of the procedural actions that inevitably aff ect the rights of the person involved in the judicial proceedings. The procedural status of investigating judge implies a multilateral approach to the circumstances of a concrete case in order to rationalize the limitation of individual’s rights, being at the same time a guarantor of legality. Assessing the opportunity to authorize special investigative measures during a criminal investigation is a basic task of the investigating judge, which is externalized in assessing the simultaneous compliance with the legal conditions externalized in the provisions of national law and the reasoning of the triple test set out in the ECtHR case law. By a fair assessment of the evidence constituting grounds for authorization of special investigative measures, the court provides protection against arbitrariness and ensures the proportionality between interference and common purpose of society.