In metamodernity, the psychological science takes on a new outline, tending to adapt itself to the spirit of an era that counts on pragmatism and involvement, on the ability to decipher people or events based on data with a direct output to reality, on the idea of reconstructing the ego through inter-relational communication, on the ability to see things in all their depth and on the desire to establish an existential order in which all situations would actually express a unitary logic. Although it significantly distances itself from the experience accumulated in the postmodern era, the metamodern psychological science, given that metamodernity represents an extension of modernity and postmodernity, is not completely isolated from what happened earlier. However, under the new historical conditions, what has been earlier stated is, to a certain extent, preserved, such as: the existence of universal truths, the diversity and competition among paradigms, the presence of monolithic existential factors, the importance of socio-cultural norms, of economic determinations and of arbitrary linguistic conventions, etc. In this way, the metamodern psychological science reproduces a complex epistemological construction, whose originality is perfectly tuned with traditionality, while discontinuity - with the spirit of continuity, and classicity - with plenary anchoring in the contempory epoch.